Citing Unpublished Cases in a Colorado Court

A judge's gavel on an open book in a library.

What Is a “Not Selected for Publication” Case?

In our legal system, judicial decisions are an important source of law. And for that reason, one critical component of a case citation is where to find the case. For a long time, that meant the volume and page number of a case reporter, but in recent decades most of us find cases online, without actually pulling out the physical books.

Sample caption from an unpublished decision
Sample caption from an unpublished decision

However, courts often issue decision which are unpublished. Pursuant to C.A.R. 35(f), such cases must carry a notation on the title page stating: “Not published pursuant to C.A.R. 35(e)”. They lack the traditional citation for a very good reason – they are considered binding only on the parties to the specific case it just decided, instead of on future courts.

And since such a case is not binding precedent, the theory goes that there is no need for the rest of us to be able to find it, or to cite it in such a way that others can cite it. So the case does not have the traditional case citation telling us where it can be found. Given that most cases are not published, this article points out the craziness of being prohibited from telling an appellate court how the majority of similar issues have been decided.

Standard for Publishing a Case

The Colorado Appellate Rules, C.A.R. 35(e) provides the following guidance to determine whether the court will publish a case:

“No court of appeals opinion shall be designated for official publication unless it satisfies one or more of the following standards:

(1)    the opinion establishes a new rule of law, or alters or modifies an existing rule, or applies an established rule to a novel fact situation;

(2)    the opinion involves a legal issue of continuing public interest;

(3)    the majority opinion, dissent, or special concurrence directs attention to the shortcomings of existing common law or inadequacies in statutes; or

(4)    the opinion resolves an apparent conflict of authority.”

Citing an Unpublished Case

In a (published) decision, the Colorado Court of Appeals recognized that even unpublished cases have some value to lawyers and courts alike – at least to trial courts. Patterson.1Patterson v James, 2018 COA 173. The Patterson court considered a case where the trial court considered an unpublished case cited by one of the litigants. On appeal, the other party argued that was improper, and violated Court of Appeals policy.

While published cases are binding on lower courts, the Court recognized that the Colorado Supreme Court instructs that an unpublished case has “no value as precedent.” However, the Patterson court interpreted this to simply prohibit citing unpublished decisions in briefs to the appellate courts:

“C.A.R. 35(f) does not prohibit parties from citing an unpublished decision in a trial court, and the court of appeals’s policy merely addresses the use of unpublished opinions in briefs filed with, and in arguments presented to the court of appeals. Consequently, the trial court did not err when it considered the unpublished decision for whatever persuasive value it may have had.”

Patterson.2Patterson v James, 2018 COA 173, ¶ 40.

While a trial court cannot treat published decision as binding precedent, an unpublished decision is not invisible. Instead, as with decisions from other states, or a law review article, the trial judge has discretion to treat the opinion as persuasive, or to ignore it completely:

“That being said, we do not mean to suggest that a trial court must consider such decisions at all. We simply acknowledge that unpublished does not mean confidential, and that our unpublished opinions are routinely shared among, for example, certain practice groups and specialty bars. As a result, it is not uncommon for trial courts to be asked to consider such an opinion. Because C.A.R. 35(e) does not endow unpublished opinions with precedential weight, however, a trial court remains free to disregard them entirely if it so chooses.”

Patterson.3Patterson v James, 2018 COA 173, ¶ 41.

A lawyer is expected to know the law, and that means published cases, so lawyers have no obligation to seek out unpublished cases. ¶ 42. But if we do find these unpublished gems, we can use that advantage by citing them in our trial briefs.

How to Find Unpublished Cases

So cases not selected for publication are still useful, but the problem is they are not easy-to-find – after all, they are unpublished!. All published cases from the Colorado Court of Appeals are provided on the court’s web site, but unpublished cases are not, and must be requested manually.

Even for lawyers, it’s difficult – per Court of Appeals policy, unpublished decisions are not available in the legal databases we use for legal research. So when we receive a copy, it may feel like we’re swapping bootlegs – we get them from an attorney involved in the case, or we go through the hassle of requesting it from the court. (And special thanks to Denver appellate attorney Sharlene Aitken who takes the time to dig up unpublished family law cases and share them with the family law bar).

We store on this site copies of all cases referenced in this blog, in the Colorado Family Law Guide, and the Military Divorce Guide. So clicking on the hyperlink in the case name will pull up the PDF of the case, whether it is published or not.

PRACTICE TIP: Since an unpublished case cannot be easily found, if you cite one you should provide a copy fo the court and other party.

Why do Published Cases Matter?

Most of the United States, including Colorado, has inherited the common law system from England, where the way courts have interpreted cases is binding for future cases. It is even enshrined in our law. C.R.S. 2-4-211 provides:

“The common law of England so far as the same is applicable and of a general nature, and all acts and statutes of the British parliament, made in aid of or to supply the defects of the common law prior to the fourth year of James the First, excepting the second section of the sixth chapter of forty-third Elizabeth, the eighth chapter of thirteenth Elizabeth, and the ninth chapter of thirty-seventh Henry the Eighth, and which are of a general nature, and not local to that kingdom, shall be the rule of decision, and shall be considered as of full force until repealed by legislative authority.”

So when the Colorado Supreme Court issues a decision, the “holding” is binding on trial courts and the Courts of Appeal. When the Colorado Court of Appeals issues a decision, it is binding on trial courts only. The Supreme Court, and other Court of Appeals panels may consider a decision persuasive, but they are not obligated to follow it (which means, on occasion, we end up with conflicting authority out of the Courts of Appeal).

Award-Winning Family Law Attorney In Colorado Springs

U.S. News & World Report calls Graham.Law one of the Best Law Firms in America, and our managing partner is a Colorado Super Lawyer. Our family law attorneys have years of experience helping clients navigate the Colorado legal system. We know Colorado divorce & family law inside and out, from complex multi-million dollar property or child custody cases to basic child support modifications.

For more information about our top-rated El Paso County family law firm, contact us by filling out the form on the right or calling us at (719) 630-1123 to set up a free consult, or click on:

Colorado Family Law. Period.


  • Excellent discussion; fully answered all my questions with examples I could clearly understand

    Jane Rohr Avatar
    Jane Rohr
  • Carl Graham is by far the best divorce attorney I have used and would highly recommend him to anyone who is looking for an ethical, knowledgable, fair attorney. My case was not your normal circumstanc... read more

    Gary Oldguy Avatar
    Gary Oldguy
  • As a former military spouse trying to collect my share of my ex's military retirement from California when the divorce decree and all the supporting documents were filed in Colorado i was apprehensive... read more

    Janine Pandher Avatar
    Janine Pandher
  • Where do I begin? Well AFTER have a consultation with another attorney ( who made me feel as though i was undeserving of his expertise) I was extremely apprehensive when coming to Graham Law. This was... read more

    Chris Whitfield Avatar
    Chris Whitfield
  • Mr. Carl Graham, Cindi (his paralegal), and the rest of his office staff helped us with a military divorce. Mr. Graham is very knowledgeable about military ways and processes. I appreciated the fact... read more

    Shelle Dier Avatar
    Shelle Dier
  • If you are searching for a divorce lawyer, first I would like to say I’m sorry you are going through this. It isn’t and easy road. I know sometimes things just don’t work out to save your marriage. Ho... read more

    Trevor Lisby Avatar
    Trevor Lisby
  • If you are searching for a divorce lawyer, first I would like to say I’m sorry you are going through this. It isn’t and easy road. I know sometimes things just don’t work out to save your marriage. Ho... read more

    Trevor Lisby Avatar
    Trevor Lisby
  • I called Graham law firm to schedule a consultation and spoke with Corinna. When beginning your search for information with any family matters there are many questions and a sense of anxiety of the u... read more

    Kathlena Williams Avatar
    Kathlena Williams
  • I was divorced in CO but moved to TX & had issues with my divorce decree from a previous attorney- after referrals from several other firms in CO regarding the best military law firm I went with Graha... read more

    Sarah DeLorean Avatar
    Sarah DeLorean
  • Very helpful initial meeting.

    Steven Babbitt Avatar
    Steven Babbitt
  • Carl and his team are awesome and super easy to work with. His knowledge is tremendous and he quickly handled my case despite me being across the country. I would do business with his team again and... read more

    Michael Brooks Avatar
    Michael Brooks
  • I was impressed by Graham Law in general but most impressed with Brian Boney. Brian is an excellent family law attorney. Attentive, detail-oriented, and hard-working, Brian surpassed my expectations f... read more

    Robert Weeks Avatar
    Robert Weeks
  • Mr. Grahm was professional, knowledgable and very prepared. He was also kind and understanding. He knew his military in's and outs. Because of this is got exactly what I was asking for... a swift a... read more

    MAMCO STAFF Avatar
  • I had the unpleasant task of taking my ex back to court. Carl was the person for the job. His attention to detail and professionalism got me the result I needed. Sincere thanks to Carl and his great s... read more

    Lisa Bruinsma Avatar
    Lisa Bruinsma
  • This firm is quite wonderful....very family and military oriented. Compassionate and patient, very understanding and will go to bat for you!!!!! Give them a call!!!!!

    Teresa Wilkie Avatar
    Teresa Wilkie
  • Brian did an amazing job helping me with a personal matter! Its not the first time I ask Brian for help, and every time he exceeds my expectations! Thank you for your kindness, understanding and suppo... read more

    Iryna Volynets Avatar
    Iryna Volynets
  • Divorce is never easy, but Carl and his warm team helped me navigate this very difficult time. This was a military divorce, so Carl's expertise helped me understand exactly what my options were as a f... read more

    Kara Longmire Avatar
    Kara Longmire
  • I have had two occasions that I have needed Carl Graham's assistance with child support issues and both times Mr. Graham and his team were amazing. Mr. Graham is straight forward and honest. I highly ... read more

    Jason Ragland Avatar
    Jason Ragland
  • Can't thank the team enough.

    Kevin Czarnecki Avatar
    Kevin Czarnecki
  • Very professional and extremely supportive throughout my needs.

    Doyle McNeil Avatar
    Doyle McNeil